Decolonizing energy transitions. The political economy of low-carbon infrastructure, justice, extraction and post-development in the Southeast of Mexico.

Abstract

This thesis examines socioecological and onto-epistemic conflicts over low-carbon infrastructure in Yucatan, Mexico. Focusing on how energy systems and policies reconfigure landscapes and vice versa, it offers an expanded view of the broader social, political, historical, economic and environmental implications of such a transformation at different scales. It argues that the reconfiguration of landscapes is mediated by a capitalist drive towards the exploitation of so-called superabundance of 'renewable energy potential' where othered territorial relationships are made invisible or seen as ‘waste’ as they are tied-in to a particular epistemology of development. This thesis draws on the analysis of Critical Political Ecology on energy transitions, on the decolonial turn and the rise of extractivism in Latin America and on the work of political ecology and ontology, which has open broader questions about how certain notions such as ‘energy’, ‘transitions’ and ‘justice’ are understood. Drawing on these contributions, this thesis argues that geographers and critical scholars must pay closer attention to low-carbon infrastructure and the transition process, not only transcending the limited and simplified fossil fuel vs. renewable energy dichotomy that shapes the hegemonic energy transition, but in their analysis of how energy systems operate around Eurocentric and universal formulations of knowledge, power and being. The thesis seeks to make a contribution to how researchers, activists and policy-makers engage with the notion of energy justice arguing for a pluriversal and relational understanding of energy and of the process of transforming energy systems.