Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham e-Theses
You are in:

Extrapolating Policy Effects - Hopes, Assumptions, and the Extrapolator's Bind

KHOSROWI, DONAL,DJEN,GHESCHLAGHI (2019) Extrapolating Policy Effects - Hopes, Assumptions, and the Extrapolator's Bind. Doctoral thesis, Durham University.

Full text not available from this repository.
Author-imposed embargo until 10 October 2022.

Abstract

Evidence-Based Policy is the movement according to which policy should be based on high-quality evidence for ‘what works’. A major problem in using evidence to inform policy is concerned with extrapolation, i.e. using evidence of policy effectiveness from a study population to learn something about the effects of a policy in a novel target population. This thesis provides a critical discussion of extrapolation in Evidence-Based Policy and aims to make general contributions to improving both the theory and practice of extrapolation. It proceeds in three parts. Part I provides a comprehensive analysis of extrapolation, including what different kinds of extrapolation there are, what makes some of them highly challenging, and what successful extrapolation is. Part II critically examines existing strategies for extrapolation proposed by philosophers, econometricians, and computer scientists. Emphasis is put on the empirical assumptions about similarities and differences between populations that these strategies involve, and it is argued that supporting these assumptions is often over-demanding. In particular, the knowledge about the target population required to underwrite an extrapolation is often so extensive that we can learn the effect of interest in the target based on this knowledge alone. This is problematic, as it can render the evidence from which one extrapolates irrelevant to an envisioned conclusion, thus undermining the success of an extrapolation. Detailed investigations are provided to highlight the conditions under which existing strategies fall prey to this problem. Building on this critical investigation, Part III makes several positive proposals for how to improve the theory and practice of extrapolation in EBP and evade the central problems that it faces.

Item Type:Thesis (Doctoral)
Award:Doctor of Philosophy
Keywords:Evidence-Based Policy; Extrapolation; External Validity; Transportability; Extrapolator's Circle; Extrapolator's Bind; Mechanisms; Econometrics; Causality; Causal Inference
Faculty and Department:Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Philosophy, Department of
Thesis Date:2019
Copyright:Copyright of this thesis is held by the author
Deposited On:16 Oct 2019 10:39

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitter