Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham e-Theses
You are in:

The electrification of water drops on freezing or f4elting at terminal velocity in air

Rogers, L. N. (1967) The electrification of water drops on freezing or f4elting at terminal velocity in air. Doctoral thesis, Durham University.

[img]
Preview
PDF
3871Kb

Abstract

Measurements on the electrification on freezing of individual water drops of diameter between 3 and 5 mm supported by an air stream have shown that the freezing behaviour of the drops is temperature-dependent. Above -10 C the freezing progressed uniformly throughout the drop from a single point. Below -10 C the outer surface of the drop froze rapidly with the exception of a small area at the top of the drop. Freezing then progressed uniformly from the base of the drop upwards. Mo shattering or electrification of the drops was observed during their freezing. These results are contrasted with those of previous workers who observed the freezing of drops suspended on fibres. Measurements of the electrification of ice spheres supported by an air stream have indicated that the sign of the charge acquired by the spheres due to riming is temperature-dependent. When the sphere is rimed by droplets at temperatures above -10 C it acquires a negative charge, and v/hen the riming droplets are at temperatures below -10 C the ice sphere acquires a positive charge. An explanation is proposed for this effect in terms of the observed freezing behaviour of individual water drops. It I suggested that this effect could lead to thunderstorm electrification of the observed polarity. Measurements on the electrification of melting ice spheres supported by an air stream indicated that the sign of the charge acquired by the spheres is dependent on whether or not water is flung off the charge was negative. This may explain the discrepancies between the laboratory and field measurements of MacCready and Proudfit.

Item Type:Thesis (Doctoral)
Award:Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Date:1967
Copyright:Copyright of this thesis is held by the author
Deposited On:13 Nov 2013 15:44

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitter