Exploring Factors Behind the Delay in Adopting Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices in
Firms
[Quality Management]

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis is to comprehensively explore the adoption of sustainable supply chain
management (SSCM) practices and the factors that influence the timing of such adoption in firms. This
research employs a rigorous approach involving a thorough literature review and empirical case
studies. The study's findings emphasise the critical significance of key factors influencing firms'
decisions regarding SSCM practices.
Significantly, this research highlights the paramount role of awareness and knowledge enhancement
within firms. A lack of information and understanding acts as a substantial barrier to SSCM adoption,
emphasising the need for educational and training programs to equip employees with the essential
skills and knowledge for sustainable practices. Collaborative efforts with supply chain partners and
suppliers emerge as a valuable strategy for promoting sustainability and innovation within the supply
chain. The study also underscores the importance of rigorous financial considerations, including costbenefit analyses, in informed decision-making and resource allocation. Addressing the risks and
disruptions associated with unsustainable practices is deemed crucial for building resilient and
sustainable supply chains.
This research's originality lies in its comprehensive approach to understanding SSCM adoption by
integrating empirical evidence from diverse case studies. It offers industry-specific insights into
challenges and opportunities, rooted in real-world contexts, revealing the intricate dynamics that
influence the timing, that influence firms' adoption decisions. The study places particular emphasis on
the timing of adopting sustainable practices, highlighting how delays and early actions shape outcomes
and strategies. By focusing on the role of education and training programs as critical tools for
overcoming adoption barriers, the research contributes a unique dimension to the field. Furthermore,
this study advances theoretical discourse while providing actionable insights aligned with industry
demands.
While these findings constitute a significant contribution to existing knowledge, it is essential to
acknowledge certain limitations. These encompass issues related to generalisability, the exploration of
alternative strategies, the need to distinguish between small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and
larger corporations, and the potential for more in-depth examinations of stakeholder dynamics.
Nonetheless, this research lays a robust foundation for insights into the complexities of sustainable
practice adoption and offers valuable directions for future research and practical applications.