We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham e-Theses
You are in:

Terminal patients and the role of the General Practitioner

Todd, Christopher James (1987) Terminal patients and the role of the General Practitioner. Doctoral thesis, Durham University.



Research into doctor patient communication and their roles is reviewed. Two series of semi-structured interviews with general practitioners (e.p.e) and patients separately are reported. In the first, 4 g. p. s each selected 6 patients for 3 groups; terminally ill with knowledge, terminally ill without, and chronic controls. Content analysis of patient transcripts revealed differences in frequency of utterances classed as showing knowledge. Differences between groups and qualitative analysis of all interviews, verified g.p.s’ categorisation. Knowledge was not simply absent or present, since all groups show awareness, but differ in the degree to which the nature of illness is openly acknowledged. One g.p. reported routinely informing patients, but others did not, although agreed this is occasionally appropriate. A typology of methods g.p.s and patients use to control information exchange is proposed. g.p.s' role formulations appear to underpin their reported communicative behaviour. 22 g.p.s were interviewed in the second series. Again they were asked to select patients, but few did this within the time allotted: therefore analysis focused upon g.p.s. Content analysis of interviews splits g.p.s into "informers" and "non informers". Qualitative analysis of g.p.s’ reported communication strategies suggests that underlying this simple dichotomy is a continuum from revelation through passive response to concealment. Strategies are implemented by various tactics; e.g. euphemism, uncertainty, denial, evasion, prompting questions. Differences in reported intentions and behaviour are interpreted by recourse to g.p.s' descriptions of their role during terminal care. Those who conceal attempt to maintain the Parsonian curative physician role and are reluctant to classify patients as terminal. Those who reveal try to abandon this role for one modelled on that of counsellor. Nearly all experience role ambiguity and attempt to resolve this in ways predicted by role theory.

Item Type:Thesis (Doctoral)
Award:Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Date:1987
Copyright:Copyright of this thesis is held by the author
Deposited On:14 Mar 2014 16:59

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitter