  <eprint id="http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/id/eprint/3446" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
    <eprintid>3446</eprintid>
    <rev_number>5</rev_number>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>2272</userid>
    <dir>00/00/00/34/46</dir>
    <datestamp>2012-03-27 10:13:30</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2012-03-27 10:13:30</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2012-03-27 10:13:30</status_changed>
    <type>thesis</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <item_issues_count>0</item_issues_count>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>BELSHAW</family>
          <given>DOUGLAS,AJ</given>
        </name>
        <id>d.a.j.belshaw@durham.ac.uk</id>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <supervisors>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Higgins</family>
          <given>Steve</given>
          <honourific>Professor</honourific>
        </name>
        <id>s.e.higgins@dur.ac.uk</id>
      </item>
    </supervisors>
    <title>What is 'digital literacy'? A Pragmatic investigation.</title>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
    <keywords>digital literacy;digital literacies;new literacies;information literacy;visual literacy;Pragmatism;learning;internet;new media;memes;framework</keywords>
    <suggestions>This thesis is also available at http://neverendingthesis.com under a Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license.</suggestions>
    <abstract>Digital literacy has been an increasingly-debated and discussed topic since the publication of Paul Gilster’s seminal Digital Literacy in 1997. It is, however, a complex term predicated on previous work in new literacies such as information literacy and computer literacy. To make sense of this complexity and uncertainty I come up with a ‘continuum of ambiguity’ and employ a Pragmatic methodology. This thesis makes three main contributions to the research area. First, I argue that considering a plurality of digital literacies helps avoid some of the problems of endlessly-redefining ‘digital literacy’. Second, I abstract eight essential elements of digital literacies from the research literature which can lead to positive action. Finally, I argue that co-constructing a definition of digital literacies (using the eight essential elements as a guide) is at least as important as the outcome.</abstract>
    <date>2012</date>
    <institution>Durham University</institution>
    <thesis_type>Doctoral</thesis_type>
    <thesis_qualification_name>EdD</thesis_qualification_name>
    <department_dur>
      <item>DDD29</item>
    </department_dur>
    <documents>
      <document id="http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/id/document/2392" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
        <docid>2392</docid>
        <rev_number>4</rev_number>
        <eprintid>3446</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <format>application/pdf</format>
        <language>en</language>
        <security>public</security>
        <license>publicdomain/zero/1.0/</license>
        <main>Ed.D._thesis_(FINAL_TO_UPLOAD).pdf</main>
        <content>accepted</content>
        <files>
          <file>
            <filename>Ed.D._thesis_(FINAL_TO_UPLOAD).pdf</filename>
            <filesize>7169799</filesize>
            <url>http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3446/1/Ed.D._thesis_(FINAL_TO_UPLOAD).pdf</url>
          </file>
        </files>
      </document>
    </documents>
  </eprint>
